<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kris Beldin's Two Cents Blog &#187; research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://krisbeldin.com/tag/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://krisbeldin.com</link>
	<description>Sharing my two cents worth -- and then some</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:00:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pew Institute Releases Early 2007 Broadband Internet Adoption Figures. . .</title>
		<link>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/07/09/pew-institute-releases-early-2007-broadband-internet-adoption-figures-2/</link>
		<comments>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/07/09/pew-institute-releases-early-2007-broadband-internet-adoption-figures-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing/PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-speed Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krisbeldin.com/pew-institute-releases-early-2007-broadband-internet-adoption-figures-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ According to the Pew Institute&#8217;s Internet &#38; American Life Project, nearly half  of all American adults (47 percent) have broadband Internet connections in their homes. On a larger scale, 70 percent of all users of Internet in the home have a high-speed Internet connection.
Also of note in the report, 40 percent of African [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://krisbeldin.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/757094_high_speed.jpg"><img style="border: 0px none ; margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px" src="http://krisbeldin.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/757094_high_speed_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="757094_high_speed" width="96" height="146" align="right" /></a> According to the <strong>Pew Institute&#8217;s Internet &amp; American Life Project</strong>, nearly half  of all American adults (<strong>47 percent</strong>) have <strong>broadband Internet</strong> connections in their homes. On a larger scale, <strong>70 percent</strong> of all users of Internet in the home have a <strong>high-speed Internet</strong> connection.</p>
<p>Also of note in the report, <strong>40 percent of African Americans have a high-speed Internet connection in the home</strong>. According to the Pew Institute, this figure has nearly tripled from the same survey taken in early 2005 (when it was a 14 percent adoption rate).</p>
<p>To read more about broadband Internet adoption from the Pew Institute, click <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/report_display.asp?r=217">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>My Two Cents:</strong> I guess the Internet is more than just a passing fad. What&#8217;s more, it&#8217;s getting faster and faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/07/09/pew-institute-releases-early-2007-broadband-internet-adoption-figures-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Searched for Brands of 2006</title>
		<link>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/03/22/top-10-searched-for-brands-of-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/03/22/top-10-searched-for-brands-of-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing/PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krisbeldin.com/top-10-searched-for-brands-of-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hitwise recently released its report of the most searched for brands on the Internet. The report is based upon search terms used across the Internet, excluding porn search terms. The report reflects some interesting data about our Internet use as a worldwide community.

It confirms that the things we search for most are actually on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hitwise.com" target="_blank">Hitwise</a> recently released its <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&amp;s=57476&amp;Nid=28565&amp;p=394080" target="_blank">report</a> of the most searched for brands on the Internet. The report is based upon search terms used across the Internet, excluding porn search terms. The report reflects some interesting data about our Internet use as a worldwide community.</p>
<ul>
<li>It confirms that the things we search for most are actually on the Internet&#8211;online services;</li>
<li>It confirms that consumers want Web access to traditional brick and mortar stores;</li>
<li>It shows that people are looking for interaction online;</li>
<li>It may be proof that social networking sites are more than a trend;</li>
<li>It proves that Yahoo! is more searched than Google&#8211;my bet is people are &#8220;Googleing&#8221; Yahoo!, what an irony.</li>
</ul>
<p>Here&#8217;s the top ten list according to Hitwise:</p>
<ol>
<li>MySpace</li>
<li>ebay</li>
<li>Yahoo!</li>
<li>Mapquest</li>
<li>craigslist</li>
<li>WalMart</li>
<li>Google</li>
<li>Target</li>
<li>match.com</li>
<li>Bank of America</li>
</ol>
<p>My Two Cents: Does this list represent anything significant? To some degree, I would say yes. The survey was based on data from 10 million Internet users, and although that is a statistically significant number, to be sure we would need to compare lists over the years. At the very least, this list serves as great case studies or best practices for anyone who wants to become successful on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/03/22/top-10-searched-for-brands-of-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web 2.0: Still wondering what it is?</title>
		<link>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/02/07/web-20-still-wondering-what-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/02/07/web-20-still-wondering-what-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krisbeldin.com/web-20-still-wondering-what-it-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this video this morning (blog post here), I think it does a great job of illustrating &#8212; not just defining &#8212; the concept known as Web 2.0. Why is this important? Good question, if companies, organizations, marketers and communicators don&#8217;t figure out Web 2.0 and then find a way to implement it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this video this morning (<a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/02/visual-explanation-for-web-20.html">blog post here</a>), I think it does a great job of illustrating &#8212; not just defining &#8212; the concept known as <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html">Web 2.0</a>. Why is this important? Good question, if companies, organizations, marketers and communicators don&#8217;t figure out Web 2.0 and then find a way to implement it as part of their overall strategy (The key here is to follow the trend, not the trendy.), they will fall behind and fail to capitalize on a large audience.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6gmP4nk0EOE" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6gmP4nk0EOE" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p>My Two Cents: Web 2.0 is still evolving and it behooves us to figure it out before it becomes <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/business/12web.html?ex=1320987600&amp;en=254d697964cedc62&amp;ei=5088">Web 3.0</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://krisbeldin.com/2007/02/07/web-20-still-wondering-what-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Adoption: Podcasting</title>
		<link>http://krisbeldin.com/2006/09/03/internet-adoption-podcasting/</link>
		<comments>http://krisbeldin.com/2006/09/03/internet-adoption-podcasting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 05:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing/PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krisbeldin.com/internet-adoption-podcasting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you&#8217;ve got something to say? Don&#8217;t feel like typing? You&#8217;d rather let your lips do the walking, that&#8217;s fine, but how many people are really going to listen to what you have to say?
As a communicator, I really get a kick out of the new communications channels the Internet has provided, and podcasting is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;ve got something to say? Don&#8217;t feel like typing? You&#8217;d rather let your lips do the walking, that&#8217;s fine, but how many people are really going to listen to what you have to say?</p>
<p>As a communicator, I really get a kick out of the new communications channels the Internet has provided, and podcasting is cool because it is tech-heavy, i.e., it requires a little bit of techknowledge in order to put it out there. The problem I have is this: How many people are going to use/listen to my podcast?</p>
<p>My gut tells me that tons of people know what a podcast is, thanks to Steve Jobs&#8217; iPod. But I think, and my good friend Russ Page agrees, the curve for adoption from there drops off big time. Now ask people if they&#8217;ve listened to a podcast, probably a pretty good response, but then get into &#8220;Do you listen to the podcasts you subscribe to on a regular basis?&#8221;; &#8220;Do you know how to subscribe to a podcast?&#8221;; &#8220;Do you know how to create a podcast?&#8221; I base much of this off of my own experience, I listen to podcasts from time to time, I even subscribe to a handful, but because my work is thought intensive, I really can&#8217;t listen to the podcast during the day, and that doesn&#8217;t leave a lot of other time for me to listen to the podcast.</p>
<p>I think podcasting is a valuable tool, but it needs a little more education to speed up the adoption process. According to the <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_podcasting.pdf">Pew Institute</a>, an April 2005 report stated that more than 22 million Americans own an Ipod or an mp3 player, of those, 29 percent have downloaded a podcast. that&#8217;s 6 million people. Definitely a lot, but the study doesn&#8217;t show repeat use, and can&#8217;t say for certain if the podcast was actually listened to&#8211;which as a communicator is very important. The research was also limited to those older than 18.</p>
<p>Here are some other interesting points:</p>
<p>• There are no differences between men and women owners of iPods/MP3 players<br />
when it comes to podcasting. They are equally likely to have downloaded<br />
podcasts.<br />
• Nearly half of those who own iPods/MP3 players between the ages of 18-28 have<br />
downloaded podcasts, compared to about 20% of the owners iPods/MP3 players<br />
over age 29 who have done so.<br />
• Somewhat surprisingly, there is no notable gap between those who have<br />
broadband access and dial-up users when it comes to podcasting. Some 33% of<br />
the owners of iPods/MP3 players who have broadband at home have downloaded<br />
podcasts and 28% of those who have dial-up at home have done so. This is not a<br />
statistically significant difference.</p>
<p>My Two Cents: I think it is still an evolving channel and given the adoption rate thus far, it may prove to be a quickly growing channel that is growing exponentially. At the very least, I think that a podcast can be a great additional resource, I would use a podcast to compliment a fact sheet or bio, it would add some audio that investors or journalists might be interested in listening to.<br />
What do you think? Have you had success/failure with podcasting? Do you think it is a viable channel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://krisbeldin.com/2006/09/03/internet-adoption-podcasting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want More Media Coverage</title>
		<link>http://krisbeldin.com/2006/08/25/want-more-media-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://krisbeldin.com/2006/08/25/want-more-media-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing/PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krisbeldin.com/want-more-media-coverage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The old saying, &#8220;A picture is worth 1000 words&#8221; is evidently more than a saying. According to Bennett &#38; Company&#8217;s 16th Annual Media Survey, 90 percent of journalists are saying that graphics are a good way to get coverage.
Read the survey results here
My Two Cents: It&#8217;s always nice to know how to get more media [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old saying, &#8220;A picture is worth 1000 words&#8221; is evidently more than a saying. According to Bennett &amp; Company&#8217;s 16th Annual Media Survey, 90 percent of journalists are saying that graphics are a good way to get coverage.</p>
<p>Read the survey results <a href="http://www.bennettandco.com/16th-annual-media-survey-results.php">here</a></p>
<p>My Two Cents: It&#8217;s always nice to know how to get more media coverage; what&#8217;s better is when the person telling you that is the journalist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://krisbeldin.com/2006/08/25/want-more-media-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

